Archive for category Diffusion

Similar, yet different: Angled QRD vs. Standard QRD

In this installment of “Similar, yet Different,” we explore the similarities and subtle differences between a classic, standard 1D QRD and a modern, angled 1D QRD. While being based on the same mathematic function for their design, there are a couple subtle differences in the performance of these devices.

Quick review. A Quadratic Residue Diffuser is based on a mathematic equation that states that the Well Depth is decided based on the square of the position of the cell and the remainder of when it is divided by a prime number. (We know it sounds really complex… but this is how the ratios of the wells are calculated to maintain a balance of magnitude across the face of the device.)

The equation looks like this:
Well Depth = (n² modulo p)
(Note: there will not be a quiz!)

As it was stated, both of the devices use the identical calculation when coming up with their wells… but there is one important change – the well bottoms are flat on the standard QRD and angled on the angled quadratic. This change makes this diffuser perform differently in 2 key ways:

  • The Diffusion Pattern is wider on the angled QRD.
  • There is a more subtle transition from one frequency to the next on the angled QRD.

When you look at the two sets of polar pattern above, you will notice that the Angled QRD has a wider pattern, as shown in the first-column, horizonal polar pattern (at 2000Hz especially), where the standard QRD is a more forward-focused pattern.

What does that mean in practice?

Both of these diffusers have a 1D pattern, but the flat bottoms of the standard QRD primarily use diffraction and incidence angle to widen the diffusion… the rest of the diffusion works on the principal of phase offset from the depth of the wells and the time of travel. The Angled QRD introduces an angle which means that one side of the well is deeper than another. This changes the reflection angle, time of travel, and, in turn, degrees of phase shift depending on where the sound strikes the inside of the well. This modification smooths the transition of phase from well to well – as the wells themselves have a range of phase change. This angle also causes the sound to be redirected toward the inner walls of the wells, causing it to change direction from the angle of incidence – widening the pattern further, changing the travel time, and basically bouncing sound around more.

There are some situations where the standard QRD‘s narrow pattern and well-defined transition frequencies may be preferable. In some practice rooms or larger listening spaces, there may be a need for the diffusion to be a little more directional, maybe to hit (or avoid) a certain position in the room. In these scenarios, the standard quadratic may be the recommended choice. In other spaces where you want the reflections to spread out more rapidly – maybe in smaller rooms or spaces where you need to get more coverage from ceiling reflections – then the angled quadratic may be more appropriate.

In closing, while these two devices have a nearly identical design, a small difference can have a big effect on the performance of the diffuser – and how you use them.

, , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

Eight very different 2′ x 2′ sound diffusers.

Acoustics First® has maximized the idea of adaptable designs. One of the most common modular architectural elements is the 2′ x 2′ ceiling grid. While standard, fiber ceiling tiles have their uses, specialized acoustic environments require higher-performing materials – for both absorption and diffusion. While Acoustics First® excels with its Sonora® and Cloudscape® Ceiling tiles, today we are going to focus on the wide range of 2’x 2′ diffusers that have been developed over the several decades.

Sound diffusers in a 2′ x 2′ format have several advantages, other than just being placed in a ceiling grid to help diffuse the ceiling. They integrate well on walls and in arrays, where they can help break up large flat surfaces and help minimize flutter and standing waves from parallel surfaces. While they provide many different aesthetic options, there are also many different functional types of diffusers available in this form-factor to address different acoustic issues, from flutter, bass issues, targeted frequency absorption, and geometric scattering. Let’s look at some of these devices and their uses.

Geometric Diffusers.

Geometric diffusers have been around a long time. These devices break up large flat surfaces and redirect or “scatter” those reflections in different directions. They work great in environments where you need to redirect acoustic energy in a predictable way, and redistribute a specular reflection over a wider area. In a 2′ x 2′ size, you can also get a fair amount of bass absorption, due to the large cavity behind the geometric shapes creating a space that can be stuffed with absorbent material to tune it.

The Pyramidal Diffuser is a classic geometric shape that provides 4 surfaces to break up the acoustic energy, these facets are also asymmetric, which prevents lobing, and reflects energy in different directions.
The QuadraPyramid™ offers the same benefits as the pyramidal, but in a lower profile, and 4 times the number of faces in the same footprint. These offer more control over high frequencies, that respond well to the multitude of smaller faces, due to their shorter wavelengths. These work well in spaces with lower ceilings to help control flutter echoes.
The Double-Duty Diffuser™ is a polycylindrical barrel diffuser, which redirects the energy in a hemispheric pattern. This pattern is easy to predict when trying to help distribute energy to many people – either in an audience, or players in an orchestra. This has the added benefit of a large cavity which works well as a bass trap.

Quadratic/Mathematic Diffusers

Mathematic diffusers are devices that use specific calculations to design their size, shape, and structures to effect their performance. A common type is called the Quadratic Residue Diffuser (sometimes called a Schroeder Diffuser, after its pioneering inventor, Manfred Schroeder). This type uses a Quadratic Residue Sequence that optimizes uniform sound diffusion at specific design frequencies. There are different ways to implement these designs, but two common designations are based on their diffusion patters – 1D or 2D. A 1D Quadratic diffuser mostly spreads energy in one plane, and a 2D provides a hemispheric pattern.

The Quadratic Diffuser is a 1D Quadratic Residue Diffuser that diffuses across the wells. This pattern looks similar to that of a Double-Duty diffuser, but is more disruptive to the phase relations of the reflections and is tuned to a narrower frequency band. These diffusers are often installed with the wells up in the ceiling or wall, which means they do not protrude from the surface, providing a clean flat look.
The ArtDiffusor® Model C is a high-performance 2D Quadratic Diffuser. It uses blocks instead of wells, and has angled caps to further assist the development of the hemispheric diffusion pattern. The Model C is a hybrid Quadratic and Binary design. It is quadratic in the heights and binary in the distribution. This unique combination of mathematic functions and the inclusion of angled reflections adds a new dimension when installing arrays of diffusers to reduce lobing and improve performance.
The ArtDiffusor® Model F is an interesting spinoff of the Model C. The Model F is a specialized low-profile version of the Model C, which uses smaller block structures to tune it to higher frequencies. Like the QuadraPyramid above, the larger number of smaller surfaces tunes this device to frequencies with a shorter wavelengths, in a low-profile design. The Model F is ideal for controlling flutter, ringing and high frequency comb filtering artifacts in spaces with limited space, or specific constraints.

Organic Diffusers.

Organic diffusers are a variation on the classic mathematic diffusers which use different mathematic functions to optimize the diffusion further by creating a smooth transition. Once such method is called Bicubic Interpolation. Instead of having the math restricted to having blocks at certain heights, the interpolation bridges these heights using a function that provides a smooth transition to the next target height. This transition creates unlimited resolution in the frequencies within it’s functional range, providing expanded uniformity throughout its range, and increasing its capabilities. As different frequencies are affected differently depending on their wavelength – the organic diffusers have no hard edges to define their pattern and look differently to different frequencies and energy from varied sources.

The Aeolian™ Diffuser is, at its core, a classic quadratic diffuser. The main difference is that, instead of limiting itself to the standard blocks and wells of a single size, the surface has been modified using bicubic interpolation. So instead of every frequency interacting with 2″x2″ blocks, they hit a rolling organic surface, which will redirect different frequencies in different ways. The different wavelengths interact and reflect off the surface differently – short wavelengths are more specular and longer wavelengths find a larger section of surface to redirect them.
The ArtDiffusor® Model D is another organic diffuser design, but it uses several different modifications to the standard quadratic design. Most quadratic diffusers start with square or rectangular blocks and wells. The Model D started life as rings of different sizes and spacing based on Maximum Length Sequences that were different thicknesses. Those rings were then raised to different heights based on the Quadratic Residue calculations. Randomness was introduced with Boolean logic, which would add height to some rings while subtracting from others when they crossed each others path. The whole geometry finally went through the bicubic interpolation to smooth the transitions. This completely original design is optimized for mid-to-high frequency diffusion and maintains a highly asymmetric diffusion pattern from any angle, at any frequency within the design range.

These diffusers all have the ability to be used in different types of installations for different reasons. Many of these diffusers are mixed and matched in the same room. You will see these on the walls or ceiling, and placed in different locations. There are rooms with Double-Duty diffusers for low frequency control, Model C for Mids, and Model F for flutter, while other rooms may have Aeolians™ on the rear wall and Model C’s and Model F’s to control the ceiling.

Big 3 Studio has Aeolians on the rear wall and black Model C’s and Model F’s on the ceiling above the console.

Keep in mind, these aren’t even all the diffusers we have available, these are just the ones specific to the 2′ x 2′ format. The Aeolian™ has a 1′ x 1′ version called the Aeolian™ Mini. There are flat panel diffusers that are hybrid absorbers and diffuser like the HiPer Panel® and the HiPer Panel® Impact. There are even large format versions of the Double Duty™ diffuser, Pyramidal, and even the Quadratic Diffuser.

For more info about these diffusers, read some of our, “Similar, Yet Different Series,” where we go into more detail about our products… and how some of these are similar, yet different!”


If you have any questions as to which products you need to optimize your space, reach out to Acoustics First® and we can help you find which products will be best for your application. Remember that Acoustics First’s® full line of sound diffusers are all made in the USA, with many available in stock for quick shipping.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

Throwback Thursday: Diffusion Vs. Absorption

On this Throwback Thursday, we look back at a popular Sound and Communications article about why sound diffusion is so much more complex a phenomenon than sound absorption. In this article, we discuss some of the different variables associated with the quantification of diffusion – magnitude, phase, frequency, direction, etc. When comparing its properties against absorption, which is simply the reduction of energy at specific frequencies, the argument is cemented as to why a single-parameter coefficient is insufficient to fully express the phenomenon of acoustic diffusion.

Read the article here:
PDF Version of Sound and Communications Article.

Sound & Communications February 2020

Revisit the original post here:
https://acousticsfirst.info/2020/03/24/acoustics-first-talks-diffusion-in-sound-communications/

, , , ,

Leave a comment

Throwback Thursday – Diffusion and Binaural Bob from 10 years ago!

In June of 2015, Acoustics First® posted about our experiment which allowed people to hear the effects of sound diffusers in a small space. The experiment consisted of treating a small office with varying numbers of our new (at the time) Art Diffusor® Model D sound diffusers, then providing various sonic stimuli and capturing and measuring the results with a custom binaural head (called “Binaural Bob.”) This experiment received great feedback and with that input, future experiments were conducted using a similar method, mixing absorbers and diffusers, and having a wider range of stimuli.

One configuration used in the test with 27 Model D’s, Binaural Bob, and a single balloon pop.

But here we look back to the first… This is the video we produced during that experiment way back in 2015 with Binaural Bob, a bunch of Model D’s, a small office, some balloons, bang snaps, and one very heavy book.

If you would like to revisit the original post in it’s entirety, here is the link!
https://acousticsfirst.info/2015/06/09/want-to-hear-acoustic-diffusion-audio-demo/

, , , , , ,

Leave a comment

Similar, yet different: HiPer Panel® vs. HiPer Panel® Impact

While the HiPer Panel® and the HiPer Panel® Impact may appear to be identical on the surface, there are some key differences that may change which one you would use, and why you would use it. They are both layered, flat-panel diffuser products, with perforations, and they are both covered in fabric. However, their construction, below the surface, is drastically different. One is a broadband absorber with a modified frequency response which focuses on reduction of specular energy, and cancellation of noise – where the other is a high frequency diffuser and reflector with a tuned bass absorption which is constructed to maintain acoustic energy in the space.

Construction

The HiPer Panel® was originally designed to optimize the capabilities of a standard broadband absorber. Its internal membrane and perforations create a material that works to modify the range of absorption, and create high frequency diffraction… but that isn’t all. The cavities are backed up to the membrane, which changes the reflection characteristics, where high frequencies can be reflected, and higher energy waves are absorbed more than if it was just fiberglass. This extended range is random, as the perforation density is gaussian in nature, but the membrane is also randomly backed by more cavities.

This design creates 4 different physical conditions that acoustic energy has to contend with… in a gaussian distribution.

  1. areas of the panel with 2 layers of fiberglass and a membrane in the middle.
  2. one layer of fiberglass with a rear membrane over a cavity.
  3. a cavity with a membrane back… sitting on fiberglass.
  4. a cavity with a membrane back… stretched over another cavity.

The random distribution of multiple acoustic obstacles is what gives this device its unique characteristics. It’s an absorber that changes its performance depending on where sound hits it, and at which frequency. Some frequencies pass into the cavities and reflect off the membrane, while others are dampened by the membrane… while longer wavelengths see the membrane as a stretched diaphragm or limp mass.

The HiPer Panel® Impact has a very different construction and may be used for a very different reason. The HiPer Panel® Impact uses the same pattern of holes, but the holes aren’t cut into an absorber… they are cut out of a reflective face, which is attached to an absober. Unlike the first HiPer Panel®, the “Impact” can be used to maintain more of the energy in the space, break up some of the higher frequencies with that gaussian hole pattern, and be a low frequency bass trap. The design is simple and effective, but is not necessarily used in the same places where you would use the first HiPer Panel®.

Use cases.

The first Hiper Panel® is often used in theaters, and listening spaces where focusing on the source is of primary importance. Its broadband absorption, gentle high frequency diffusion, and smooth mid frequency control are ideal for critical listening environments such as mixing rooms, media rooms, theaters, or even voice over spaces. The performance is about removing the acoustic elements that could interfere with the focus on the source speakers.

The HiPer Panel® Impact is often used in performance spaces, where you want to maintain energy, break up high frequency flutter, and remove low bass. The reflective face doesn’t remove as much energy from the space, however it does change the characteristics of the space. This helps break up some frequencies, reduce bass, and keep the energy moving around the room. Music halls, churches, auditoriums, and any space that relies on the room helping to reinforce the sound will benefit from these taking the edge off the highs and dampening the lows – which is how the HiPer Panel® Impact controls the sound… while helping it maintain its “impact.”

In summary, while these two products are in the same family, they have a different core construction, which changes their performance. There are scenarios where you may use them both, however since they address different problems in a space, they are not always interchangeable. Contact Acoustics First® if you have questions about any of our products.

, , , , ,

Leave a comment